Search for: "In Re Kennedy"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 4,536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
If you don’t, they’re onto something else. [read post]
5 May 2011, 7:03 pm
However, I’m fascinated by how we’re pushed and pulled toward the newest tech. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:41 pm
You're conducting a sting operation, not shooting a porno flick. [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:39 pm
“But if we’re to have a program of the type that we described as attractive in the report that we put out, there’s not enough money in the out years to do it. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:34 pm
[FN1]If you’re a Biglaw litigator searching for a published opinion addressing discovery issues, well, today is your lucky day. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:10 am
We’re not going to lie, people: As much as we love the legal wedding scene, we’ve never gotten out of bed at 5:30 to read about SCOTUS clerks tying the knot. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 11:23 am
“Everybody that he ran into, he thanked them for what we’re doing,” Cabana said. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm
The Court already has a 5 – 4 conservative majority (if you really think Justice Anthony Kennedy is a “swing” vote, you’re a Republican who likes to pretend to be an independent). [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
Come on: the Kennedys, the Clintons, the Bushes… don’t think we haven’t noticed. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
I am pleased to reprint below as a guest post a detailed article about the oral argument this past week before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Erica P. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:53 pm
In re Am. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:47 pm
(43) This isn’t a case about false advertising.Justice Kennedy(9) The data could be sold to universities. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:36 am
Joining Scalia were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:00 am
” In his rebuttal, Shah re-emphasized that the fiduciary exception should not apply because the rationale supporting the common law exception is not applicable against the government. [read post]
Oral Argument Preview: Supreme Court Reviewing Ethics Laws - Is An Elected Official's Vote "Speech?"
26 Apr 2011, 7:36 am
Its brief doesn't so much argue what the standard should be, only that it's not strict scrutiny, and we're guessing that if the majority doesn't buy into the rational basis approach, the Commission would concede an intermediate standard in order to get Justice Kennedy's vote, since the Nevada statute would most likely pass under that standard of review. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:42 pm
/M.P.A. student at New York University School of Law and the Harvard Kennedy School. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Obama, 10-775, which it had previously relisted three times; Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Sotomayor, issued a statement respecting the denial of certiorari in Kiyemba. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
The much anticipated oral arguments in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. took place at the Supreme Court yesterday, April 18, 2011. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
The much anticipated oral arguments in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. took place at the Supreme Court yesterday, April 18, 2011. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times suggests that Microsoft faced “significant headwinds” at oral argument, although he also notes that Justice Breyer remained frustrated as the arguments drew to a close: “’What we’re trying to do is we’re trying to get a better tool, if possible, to separate the sheep from the goats,’ he said. [read post]
