Search for: "In re D. W."
Results 2861 - 2880
of 4,486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 6:24 am
By W. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
Its democratic mandate to make laws for the people of Scotland is beyond question”; and Lord Reed similarly noted that “(w)ithin the limits set by section 29(2) . . . [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
-Houston [1st Dist.] 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.), and US MCT, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
For one of the few decisions analyzing this issue, see In re French, Case No. 06-20066 (Bankr. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
For one of the few decisions analyzing this issue, see In re French, Case No. 06-20066 (Bankr. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:40 pm
" Notice that it doesn't say "re-elected" on or after such date. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:30 am
Now that we’re not paying Louisiana to house some of our prisoners, maybe we can take some of the money we’d been spending on that and use it to hire a few more guards. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 2:28 am
In case you’re wondering, he wasn’t wearing flippers. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:08 pm
“In an era when we’re squeezing the federal budget for every dollar of savings, we have to make every effort to recover these lost funds,” said Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont). [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:37 am
George W. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:59 am
Which brings us neatly to Jordan W. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:41 am
A. und B. waren die beiden einzigen Aktionäre der C. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:50 am
In re: Bisphenol-A Polycarbonate Plastic Products Liability Litigation, No. 08-1967 (W. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:58 am
After being “sentenced to an indeterminate term of 18 years to life,” he appealed, which eventually led to the opinion we’re examining. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
In the majority opinion, Judges Brown, joined by Judge Kavanaugh, argued not only that the laws of war should not inform interpretation of the AUMF’s limits, but even that the AUMF should not be construed to avoid authorizing violations of that body of international law: “[W]hile the international laws of war are helpful to courts when identifying the general set of war powers to [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:30 pm
Blogger Bob Burns TSA Blog TeamIf you’d like to comment on an unrelated topic you can do so in our Off Topic Comments post. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
We blogged about W-G here .7. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
W. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:27 am
Blogger Bob Burns TSA Blog TeamIf you’d like to comment on an unrelated topic you can do so in our Off Topic Comments post. [read post]
