Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 2861 - 2880 of 4,886
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm by The Federalist Society
To discuss the case, we have Thomas Merrill, who is the Charles Evans Hughes Professor of Law at Columbia Law School. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:57 am by Lovechilde
  (Scalia, with Justices Kennedy and Thomas, have the distinction of also being in the majority of another of high court's low points, Citizens United.) [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm by Randy Barnett
 (Significantly, Justice Kennedy, in his concurring opinion in Comstock, recently advocated a heightened rational basis scrutiny in Commerce Clause cases.) [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am by The Federalist Society
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, and Kagan joined Justice Thomas’ opinion. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:16 pm by The Federalist Society
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Kagan joined Justice Alito’s opinion. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
Justice Thomas, writing for the majority applied the precedent to the plaintiffs' claim, which would not have even been scientifically recognizable when the statute was passed. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:30 pm by Khiara M. Bridges
for a 4-4 split – with Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kennedy on one side and Justices Alito, Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas on the other. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:38 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
Second, get the vote of Justice Thomas – that’s right, Justice Thomas. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:17 am by CivPro Blogger
Justice Thomas wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Alito and Kagan. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
” John Gibeaut at the ABA Journal discusses the calls for Justices Thomas and Kagan to recuse themselves from the challenges to the Affordable Care Act and concludes that even after next month’s arguments in the case, “the debate will likely continue. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm by David Gans
Bollinger, which upheld a similar policy adopted by the University of Michigan Law School by a 5-4 vote over the dissents of Justices Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas, and then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:46 am by Scott Dodson
  First, neither Justice Clarence Thomas nor Justice Anthony Kennedy asked a question. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
I don’t want to recount the details of the ATS, but rather want to focus on a very particular issue: the analytical sleight-of-hand that Justices Scalia and Thomas, and presumably Justices Roberts, Alito, and Kennedy, will likely use to deny victims of human rights abuse a right to civil redress granted to them at the very beginning of our nation. [read post]