Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 6,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2015, 9:23 am
Beastie Boys v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Davis asks the now-familiar question whether Miller v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:11 am
In a recent Maryland family law case, Davis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The Court disagreed, citing SCOTUS’s Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am
Other coverage comes from Tony Mauro for the Supreme Court Brief, Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST; commentary comes from Martha Davis at the Human Rights at Home Blog, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, and Daniel Fisher at Forbes, The Court also issued its decision in Mach Mining v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Ceballos (2006) and Morse v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
Mr Justice Warby, who gave the judgment, with which Lord Justice Bean and Mr Justice William Davies agreed, said it would have been “anomalous” for editors to be exempt from liability under section 39 when they were prima facie liable at common law for libel and contempt, and were expressly identified as persons liable under every other statute which imposed criminal liability for publication. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm
Supreme Court Grants Cert in Spokeo v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:02 pm
The jury instruction was thus proper under Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
No wonder journalism seems about as appealing nowadays as, well, law. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Timothy Davis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Stephen Clark, But for Sex: Equal Protection and the Individual Opportunity to Marry One's Chosen Partner Without Regard to Sex, (South Dakota Law Review, Forthcoming).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Robin Fretwell Wilson, When Governments Insulate Dissenters From Social Change: What Hobby Lobby and Abortion Conscience Clauses Teach About Specific Exemptions,48 UC Davis Law Review 703-790 (2014).Is Religion Outdated (As A Constitutional Category)? [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
We have previously noted that when a statute imposes criminal liability for knowingly disregarding a risk, it does not require a particular outcome or actions aimed at a specific individual; the crime is solely defined by the risk of injury produced by defendant's conduct (see, People v Davis, 72 NY2d 32, 36-37). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:38 am
Davis también fue uno de los defensores principales de la segregación racial en las escuelas, y argumentó a favor de la misma en el caso Brown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:20 pm
On 30 March 2015, the Upper Tribunal gave judgment in the case of Department of Health v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:51 am
Davis’ note undertakes a thorough analysis of pay-to-play and Supreme Court jurisprudence as articulated through cases such as McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:51 am
Davis’ note undertakes a thorough analysis of pay-to-play and Supreme Court jurisprudence as articulated through cases such as McCutcheon v. [read post]
