Search for: "LEE v. STATE" Results 2861 - 2880 of 5,083
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Hobby Lobby Part VII: Hobby Lobby's arguments on compelling interest and the alleged exemption "honeycomb"
17 Feb 2014, 12:34 pm by Marty Lederman
Lee (1982), and Gillette v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Sasha Volokh] The Supreme Court has restricted civil rights litigation by federal private prison inmates: should we care?
17 Feb 2014, 9:46 am
Minneci v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
President's Day News & Notes (Supreme Court style)
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am by David Markus
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
Southern District of Florida Blog - http://sdfla.blogspot.com/
HLR Free Speech Symposium: Marvin Ammori, Free Speech Lawyering in the Age of Google and Twitter
17 Feb 2014, 6:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ben Lee, as a second year, interned at the firm that represented the NYT in NYT v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
More Intellectual Property Trivia Questions (The Outtakes)
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
  Teresa Stanek Rea was Acting Director from February 1, 2013, and Michelle Lee is now a Deputy Director. ____ Q: Who was issued U.S. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Hobby Lobby Part VI: The parties' common ground . . . and a fundamental divide about religious exemptions for for-profit employers
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am by Marty Lederman
  Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Chartreuse Sues Chartreuse Fragrances Seeking Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement
14 Feb 2014, 9:12 am
In MedImmune v. [read post]
Indiana Intellectual Property Lawyer Blog - http://www.iniplaw.org/
A Couple of Useful Items
13 Feb 2014, 11:10 am
& Lee L.R. at 1634. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
How Well Do You Know IP Trivia? Let’s Find Out
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Q9: Actress Jamie Lee Curtis obtained Patent #4,753,647. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Thursday round-up
13 Feb 2014, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
 Writing for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the effect that the Court’s 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Eugene Volokh] The “tipsy coachman” doctrine
11 Feb 2014, 8:47 am
See Lee v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
WIPIP: First Amendment
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Weekend Roundup
7 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
On SCOTUSblog, Ronald Collins interviews Lee Levine and Stephen Wermiel about their just published book, The Progeny: Justice William Brennan’s Fight to Save New York Times v. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
U.S. Supreme Court defining “Mental Retardation in Capital Cases this March
7 Feb 2014, 11:47 am
Supreme Court held in Atkins v. [read post]
Cincinnati Law Library Blog - http://cincinnatilaw.blogspot.com/
Exela takes its Collateral Patent Challenge to the Federal Circuit
7 Feb 2014, 3:10 am by Dennis Crouch
Focarino (Lee) (Fed. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Shubha Ghosh: IP Federalism
6 Feb 2014, 8:42 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
(On New York's recent actions, see Tim Lee's and Michael Looney's reporting). [read post]
Written Description - http://writtendescription.blogspot.com/
Book profile: A Conspiracy Against Obamacare – The book based on the blog
30 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by Ronald Collins
There was yet more: there were the challenges to the ACA brought by state attorneys general. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Hobby Lobby Part V: Whose Religious Exercise? Of corporations, for-profit employers, and individual plaintiffs acting in their various corporate capacities
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Randy Barnett] “Judicial engagement” is not the same as “judicial activism”
28 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
Lee Optical. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Orin Kerr] Justice Sotomayor on her privacy opinion: “Remember, I was only one of nine.”
27 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
Justice Sotomayor’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/