Search for: "Label v Label" Results 2861 - 2880 of 13,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2011, 7:59 am
Thus, the statements made on the label that the guacamole contained “0 g transfats” and “0 g cholesterol” were not actionable under the consumer protection statutes.The April 11 decision in Henderson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
  (I generally don't care for those labels, but sometimes the simplistic model works.)It also bears noting that Spider Man made an appearance in the high court in a patent/contract case, Kimble v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:40 am
  Finally, the court rejected the novel argument that Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
 The case is a tricky one, exploring second medical use claims, skinny labels, and public policy issues around healthcare. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
Nonetheless, there may be a decent reason for Judge Wallace to label his opinion in this case "writing separately," since what he wants -- for the case to be taken en banc -- doesn't really fit the usual categories. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:24 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
  FIFRA imposes registration, labeling, and application restrictions supervised by the Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]