Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
The Moore Opinion also states that the true and fair view is of an overarching nature. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
SmallThe interwebs have been abuzz this week with gleeful snarking about Sanches v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm
The appeal, known as ETK v NGN Ltd , was listed in private. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:36 am
The CA could not help observing that Flaux J “found himself unable to follow” observations of Lord Hoffman in R v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play Does “bringing rights home” mean bringing problems home too? [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
Christopher Hutcheson (formerly known as KGM) v News Group Newspapers and others [2011] EWCA Civ 808 In these turbulent times for Rupert Murdoch (see the UK Human Rights Blog contempt post) it seems strange to see one of his newspapers being vindicated by the courts, but, for once, The Sun seems to have been on the side of the angels. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am
Christopher Hutcheson (formerly known as KGM) v News Group Newspapers and others – read judgment In these turbulent times for Rupert Murdoch (see our contempt post) it seems strange to see one of his newspapers being vindicated by the courts, but, for once, The Sun seems to be coming up smelling of roses. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
Lord Hope stated: “They [the ISA] must make their own assessment of the reliability of the evidence. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
RPC Privacy Blog also notes that Lord Justice Leveson, judge of the Court of Appeal, will head the phone-hacking Inquiry. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
On Wednesday, the UK Supreme Court handed down its decision in Al-Rawi v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
The obvious drawback of this “preposterous” position (Lord Brown [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:57 pm
Such is the case with Vasquez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:18 am
Third, where the use of force by a State’s agents operating outside its territory bring an individual under the control of the State’s authorities, and thereby into its jurisdiction (the examples given here involve Issa v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court hearing is to take place on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 and will be heard by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:33 am
Bobby has the scoop on the first case, Al-Jedda v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 pm
In Bryan v UK the European Court stated: 37. [read post]
