Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 5,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
It doesn’t matter if the stock went up and down a hundred times in the middle. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:15 am
P., 35 Fla. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:36 am
Rather, this Court has long recognized its discretion to retain jurisdiction over a matter and proceed with an appeal notwithstanding a litigant’s timely filing of a notice of dismissal pursuant to rule 9.350, especially when the matter involves one of great public importance and is likely to recur. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 6:19 am
ASHER WORLDWIDE ENTERPRISES LLC, d/b/a RELIABUY.COM, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:45 am
A lawyer investigating or litigating a matter is prohibited from making a public, extrajudicial statement if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the statement will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:14 pm
The district court denied class certification, holding that Oshana could not satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) or Rule 23(b).In this case, subject-matter jurisdiction could be based only on diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 7:29 am
Trust but Verify P. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:39 pm
If CEO has VP’s A, B, and C, and each VP has employees 1 through 10, etc., each VP is going to be competing to reduce costs. [read post]
Guest Post: Halliburton II Price Impact Defenses Can Limit Severity on Deficient Exchange Act Claims
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm
The growth and evolution of Rule 10(b)-5 private securities fraud litigation has been manna from heaven for the trial bar. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
The SEC’s order finds that Morgan Stanley violated Rule 30(a) of Regulation S-P, also known as the “Safeguards Rule. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm
Este es un foro público. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
J&J moved to dismiss the punitive damages claim "[b]ecause Plaintiffs have not alleged that the FDA has determined that it was defrauded. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:31 am
See 29 U.S.C. sec. 8(a)(5), (b)(3). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:38 am
” W.R.C.P. 26(b)(1). [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 2:00 am
Fisher, 230 Kan. 192, 631 P.2d 239 (1981)). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 11:19 am
-Blog post authored by TLG Attorney, Kyle B. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Intermarket Electroplasters (P) Ltd., Pfizer Products, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
” Which answers matter? [read post]
