Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 2861 - 2880 of 42,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The entitlement to disclosure of relevant evidence is therefore not an absolute right under the Convention. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm by emagraken
 Under the former rules parties had to disclose documents “relating to every matter in question in the action“. [read post]
Summary judgment is a process in which either party can ask the court to rule in their favor before witnesses are sworn or evidence is considered. [read post]
Summary judgment is a process in which either party can ask the court to rule in their favor before witnesses are sworn or evidence is considered. [read post]
Ultimately, the FTC’s notice shows the FTC’s continued commitment to children’s privacy matters, suggesting more frequent review of the COPPA Rule if necessary to keep pace with technological advances and potentially increased activity in this sphere. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 4:12 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
As a result, the court ruled that the plaintiffs supplied sufficient evidence to survive a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:32 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The court found that the Board did not owe the girl a duty of care, and that even if it did, the girl and her mother were contributorily negligent as a matter of law. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:07 pm by Brett A. Overby
The California Supreme Court granted review on November 22, 2016, but deferred action in the matter pending the decision in the next case, Alameda County Deputy Sheriff’s Assn. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
This self-evident rule of non-interference was recognized in a document prepared by the federal government in 2015: Open and Accountable Government: “Ministers must not intervene, or appear to intervene, with tribunals on any matter requiring a decision in their quasi-judicial capacity, except as permitted by statute”. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 1:18 pm by Alexis Hoag-Fordjour
For John Montenegro Cruz, and nearly 30 other similarly situated people on Arizona’s death row, the case is a matter of life or death. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:21 pm
The newly posted guidance instructs that self-disclosure made under the rule "are made with no advance agreement regarding possible OIG resolution of the matter and with no promises regarding potential civil or criminal actions by the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 6:44 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Unlike ordinary jurors, senators get to decide what evidence they hear (by voting on the Chief Justice's rulings). [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
One question that comes to mind is whether any of this will matter one whit to the NYPD. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
" "That Court on December 26, 2013, without explicitly ruling that Jahi’s death was 'irreversible,' found that Jahi at that time 'had suffered brain death and was deceased as defined under Health and Safety Code sections 7180 and 7181.' No evidence regarding Jahi’s neurological function has been heard by any court subsequent to this hearing, two years ago. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:38 pm
Alicja’s brief makes repeated references to evidence without any citation to the record as required by California Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1). [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:59 pm
One question that comes to mind is whether any of this will matter one whit to the NYPD. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 4:02 am
" The Fourth Circuit ruled that, although the district court made certain improper inferences in its analysis, the evidence was "so one-sided" that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the Dairy Export Council "must prevail as a matter of law. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:31 am
Stephen Bilkis & Associates have legal counsel who are very meticulous with the evidence in their cases. [read post]