Search for: "MATTER OF T H" Results 2861 - 2880 of 6,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
” Given the successful appeal in that case, the use of the clause ultimately wasn’t necessary. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 2:20 am by Dave
As regards the latter, the decision is understandable both as a matter of theory as well as a matter of practicality. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 4:58 am by Broc Romanek
The document makes clear that isn't the case, and that Facebook will likely be a publicly traded company in 2012. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:10 pm by Christopher Simon
H & H Operations, Inc. 263 Ga 652 (1993) where the convenience store was liable for injuries caused when the sold booze to a minor who drove drunk. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
Yet as a general matter, such concerns, which are present in many cases (especially in employment cases), don't justify pseudonymity. [read post]
24 May 2019, 6:52 am by umbrella
The Report opined that a driver in charge of a motor vehicle travelling 60 to 70 km/h, instead of the posted 50 km/h, increases the likelihood of the plaintiff suffering injuries from between 1 percent and 49 percent to between 13 percent and 84 percent. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm by Florida Employment Law Letter
The EEOC settled the matter for $5 million after filing suit against Signal in federal district court. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
Why can’t I just ignore the emotions and do the ‘logical’ thing? [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
  H/T Eric Turkewitz© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:08 pm by Heather M. Milligan
I am not a lawyer, and I don't even play one at the water cooler, but I would think ghost-blogging might be frowned upon via sections D-1 (you didn't write it), D-2 (you didn't write it), and, D-3 (you didn't write it). [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
A panel of experts advising the CDC is scheduled to debate the matter next week. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm by NL
But the recognition of the right of the survivor under a joint tenancy is not inconsistent with the provisions of section 89 relating to the transmission of tenancies, because the survivor’s right is not a matter of transmission. [read post]