Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 10,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am
Rather, a more certain and concrete harm of knowing falsehoods about military honors is the harm to listeners who are defrauded by such falsehoods — a harm that can often be greater than the harm from knowing falsehoods aimed at getting political contributions, and that is especially great precisely because military honors are so respected and valued. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:13 am
Rather, a more certain and concrete harm of knowing falsehoods about military honors is the harm to listeners who are defrauded by such falsehoods — a harm that can often be greater than the harm from knowing falsehoods aimed at getting political contributions, and that is especially great precisely because military honors are so respected and valued. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
While youth use of any nicotine product is a major issue, there has been marked improvements in tackling youth use in the last few years. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:37 pm
It is reported that the plaintiff’s decedent then treated with another doctor, who noted that plaintiff’s decedent had track marks on her arm and diagnosed her with an opioid dependency, and a second doctor, who discharged her from his practice for using cocaine. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:14 am
It noted that “reckless disregard” is defined as “conscious indifference to the consequences of an act” and “conscious disregard of a substantial harm. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:14 am
It noted that “reckless disregard” is defined as “conscious indifference to the consequences of an act” and “conscious disregard of a substantial harm. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:28 pm
A further argument goes that Apple’s launch and continued use of the iCloud mark caused irreparable harm to its business reputation and goodwill. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (First published in Competition Policy International, Antitrust Chronicle) “As a result of this alleged conspiracy, we believe that consumers paid millions of dollars more for some of the most popular titles. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:37 am
Mark claimed that on November 5, 2018, the couple attended a concert. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
You don't need to publicly acknowledge your antisemitism, nor, like the Nazis, consider Jews subhuman, beyond redemption, and marked for extinction. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing uses… [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:35 pm
Even luxury items that are not properly produced can cause harm– suppose a counterfeit golf club breaks mid swing. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:10 pm
In passing the statute prohibiting deceptive patent mismarking, Congress determined that such conduct is harmful and should be prohibited. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:44 am
” “Plaintiff asserts this negligence cause of action alleging only economic harm. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:21 am
Mark R. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 10:38 am
Mark the time and date, Chip Merlin and Jonathon Held have complete agreement upon something: Appraisers should not have to hold adjuster licenses. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:28 pm
(Particularly given the victim’s family’s insistence that Mark Kerrigan had no intent to cause death or serious bodily harm to the victim.) [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:28 pm
(Particularly given the victim’s family’s insistence that Mark Kerrigan had no intent to cause death or serious bodily harm to the victim.) [read post]
14 May 2007, 9:24 pm
The court found: “A question of material fact remains as to whether BNB’s actions in selling mattresses bearing the TEMPUR-PEDIC® mark have created an ‘association’ between the mattresses that it sells bearing the TEMPUR-PEDIC® mark and those sold by Tempur-Pedic so as to ‘harm[] the reputation’ of the TEMPUR-PEDIC® trademark. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 4:42 am
In the court’s words: “Section 1125(c) no longer requires the owner to demonstrate actual harm, a standard established by the Supreme Court in Moseley v. [read post]
