Search for: "Officer Miller" Results 2861 - 2880 of 6,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2009, 5:55 pm
And do you plan to immediately get preggers and start padding around the office barefoot? [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 8:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The complaint names as defendants the two Millers; the other members of the company’s board, and certain of the company’s officers. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Come on Tom Miller, are you serious? [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:38 pm by Daithi Mac Sithigh
 From this, Miller suggests that Zittrain’s arguments for change were actually quite modest ones. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 3:39 am by Dan Filler
The University of Michigan has retained Isaacson, Miller, a national executive search firm, to assist in this recruitment. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
See Miller, 865 So. 2d at 588 (holding that the presence of three officers in uniform was a considerable show of authority sufficient to create the perception that a major criminal investigation was underway). [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:14 am by John Day
S. 178, 189 (1936); see also 13E Wright & Miller §3602.1, at 119. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am by Robert Chesney
President Trump’s recent move to install a set of lame-duck “acting” officials atop the Pentagon (that is, officials who have neither been nominated to hold these offices on a permanent basis nor put forward for Senate confirmation) continues to spawn major policy changes. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:50 am by Alex Loomis
March 10th opens with a lengthy examination of an unnamed Senior Medical Officer (SMO), who was formerly responsible for caring for Nashiri from September 2016 through February 2017. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 12:28 pm by George Perkovich
When the aforementioned Franklin Miller and Gil Klinger were doing their targeting review in the late 1980s, Klinger quipped to Miller: “If (God forbid) there’s a nuclear war, and if (God forbid) you and I survive it, and if (God forbid) the Russians win, we’re going to be put on trial at Nuremberg” (p. 180). [read post]
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has altered dramatically the… [read post]