Search for: "P.C., Matter of" Results 2861 - 2880 of 6,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:42 pm by Michael Bersani
Then, to make matters much worse, a second car ran over her as she lay in the road. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am by John Ehrett
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:55 am by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
As seasoned practitioners, the Chicago attorneys of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. have provided representation to Illinois residents in a diverse range of personal injury cases. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied “clearly established” law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern “the matter[s] pending before the jury”? [read post]
18 May 2015, 12:35 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
Contact the Chicago Auto Collision of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. by calling 773-516-4100, or send us a message online. [read post]
17 May 2015, 3:53 pm by New Mexico Employment Law Letter
Rieder is an attorney with Foster, Rieder & Jackson, P.C. in Albuquerque, New Mexico. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
The associate and counsel of record, Ashley Tomlinson, one of  the associates in Salazar, filed a declaration stating: "I am very familiar with the hourly  rate that attorneys at my level of practice charge in matters of this nature. [read post]