Search for: "People v. House"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives to repeal the law, and a razor-thin loss for repeal advocates in the Supreme Court in 2012. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
Because if we think about 10 years ago v. today there’s been extraordinary progress. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm
”Referring to Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
News & World Report has an interview with Bill Burck, who served as White House deputy counsel under George W. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:05 pm
The case, Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 12:03 pm
The practice of tagging was recently struck down, in Pichler, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
Some people are cheering and some people are shrugging in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Star Athletica v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:11 pm
According to Oregon v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:11 pm
According to Oregon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
First up is Thacker v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 2:09 pm
The dissent (to which only Judge Halligan signed on) offers a rare sociological attack on the criminal justice system.The case is People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm
In Scotland, members of the British House of Commons were not elected directly by the people (as they were in England). [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
However, there do seem to be a few of them around at this time of year -- and there also seem to be a lot of people, especially Europeans, who are determined to attend them. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:43 am
But b) has very little salience now, given that the cap on assessed value is substantially higher than what people are actually paying--due to the housing bust. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
The case is entitled Wang v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 12:00 am
It isn't a wage & hour case, but this is the most ridiculous b.s. settlement tactic we've ever seen in an employment dispute: Nelson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
The federal district court judge who has the case began his analysis of Meregildo’s motion by noting that the4th Amendment guarantees that all people shall be `secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:53 pm
Coulter v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 5:05 am
State and a 1971 case out of California referred to as People v. [read post]
