Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 55,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 2:47 am
Minemyer v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
That reading of Lopez was rejected by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:30 am
This approach is exemplified by the Supreme Court’s handling of a discovery dispute in Cheney v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 6:31 am
US v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:37 pm
Administrative law — Administrative charge — Parking citation On his own behalf and on behalf of a putative class, Joshua Whitaker challenges the City of Baltimore’s power to collect an administrative charge of $2 per uncontested parking citation. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 12:39 pm
Powerful. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:58 am
I knew that if you messed around with someone powerful in Hollywood, you risk being canned with the line: "You'll never work in this town again! [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:06 am
Mom and pop pizza shops in Washington D.C. are having a tough time keeping their slice of the pie against larger, techno-powered chains in the age of conveyor-belt pizzas and delivery apps which cater to customers’ cravings for convenience, reports Washington City Paper. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
by Clark Taylor In Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm
In Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 9:30 pm
In Bendetson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in American Electric Power v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Mississippi Supreme Court Rejects Chevron Deference to State Administrative Agencies
10 Jul 2018, 4:47 pm
Although not writing of Mississippi's constitutional separation of powers, we find persuasive the reasoning of then-Judge Gorsuch who wrote, in a separate opinion ... in Gutierrez–Brizuela v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm
Dollar General argues that this type of analysis is what led the Court to rule that tribal courts lacked power over non-Indians in criminal matters in Oliphant v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:06 am
EPA and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:43 am
Floyd v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Read the Wisconsin State Journal (Riley Vetterkind) article, or the 4-3 decision in Wisconsin Legislature v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
