Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 2861 - 2880 of 21,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
In 2003, he pled guilty to one count of “counterfeit of a registered mark” in violation of California Penal Code § 350(a)(2), which imposes criminal penalties on any person who “willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office…” In… [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Lindsay J. Jarusiewicz
In Cellular Sales of Missouri, LLC, Case No. 14-CA-094714, the ALJ ruled against Cellular Sales and held the provision at issue violated Section 7 of the NLRA, stating that she was bound by the Board’s precedent in D.R. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 7:39 am by CMS
On 29 June 2022, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd and Anor [2022] UKSC 19. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
 The Court took particular care to avoid ruling on a preemption issue raised by Morgan where Morgan argued that a New Jersey State case, Lefever v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:03 am by David
Worse, invalidity “under the on-sale bar is a question of law with underlying questions of fact. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:21 am by Howard Wasserman
The case involved two non-New York gun dealers sued by New York City on a public-nuisance theory, attributing NYC gun violence to these out-of-state sales. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:03 am by Marianna Lambrou
The wife’s case at this hearing was that the Court should award her with half of the matrimonial assets which included the husband’s share sales of £490m. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:33 am by Don Cruse
HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, No. 11-0283 , and SUSAN COMBS, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND GREG ABBOTT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
— (a) The Legislature recognizes that schemes to defraud have proliferated in the United States in recent years and that many operators of schemes to defraud use communications technology to solicit victims and thereby conceal their identities and overcome a victim's normal resistance to sales pressure by delivering a personalized sales message. [read post]