Search for: "Spells v. Spells"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 3,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2013, 1:50 am
V. [read post]
29 May 2015, 12:33 pm
Given that cause is not specifically defined in this context, employers should take care to spell out expectations in advance for their household employees, preferably in writing and with agreement by the employee, and document performance issues in writing. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
A recent decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, in Giaimo v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 2:19 pm
In 2020, Idaho passed a law to prohibit most abortions in the state in the event the Supreme Court ever overturned Roe v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:00 pm
Trustee might want to avoid raising controversy over the potential for politically-charged issues which can result in Roe v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:34 am
The fun and games concerning the General Court's failure in Cases T-253 and 354/09 Wilo v OHIM is/are now over. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am
Justice Strathy concluded that “a part of the court’s responsibility in class actions is to protect the rights of prospective class members” and “to postpone the decision to post-certification, when the views of class members can be sought, could very well spell the end of this proceeding, because the plaintiffs cannot withstand an adverse costs award on certification. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:47 am
The lower court summarily dismissed the petition and last week, in Sternlicht v Daniel Z. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am
The S&H Nadlan Case In S&H Nadlan, LLC v MLK Associates, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 30523(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 7, 2016], Justice Donna M. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:42 am
., v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 8:36 am
The application form spells out the requirements for this program on the third page. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:02 am
A Justice Department lawyer indicated it might be by the end of the summer — more than a year after the Supreme Court’s June 12 decision giving the detainees’ a constitutional right to go to court to challenge their captivity (Boumediene v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm
There are some close observers of detention policy and practice who have concluded that the courts simply cannot handle - or cannot handle well - the task handed to them by the Supreme Court decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:58 pm
It has its moments, of course it does, there are spells of huge joy and deep misery. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 11:21 pm
It’s M-I-H-A-L-O-V-I-C-H. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:29 am
His order blocking enforcement is now under review by the Justices in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
