Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 29,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:46 am
Congress could preempt much state regulation and litigation concerning climate change, it just has not done so. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 9:30 pm
NFIB v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am
James Coppess is the associate general counsel for the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, which filed an amicus brief in support of the union in Janus v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:13 pm
In mid-March, the Court granted certiorari in Negusie v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:12 pm
In 1996, Congress was fed up with federal courts -- particularly the Ninth Circuit -- overturning state decisions in capital cases based on dubious legal reasoning. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
West v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm
United States 16-1320 Issues: (1) Whether, in the exercise of its Article I powers, Congress can infringe, reduce or diminish the territorial integrity of a state without its prior consent; (2) whether Congress possesses plenary power over Indian affairs and, if so, whether the plenary power expands the Indian commerce clause to authorize the displacement of state rights to territorial integrity; (3) whether the land acquisition in this case via the… [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:52 am
This morning, five of us filed an amicus brief in Texas v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:14 pm
Moreover, Carson argues that if the court determines that the political branches—in this case, two presidents and Congress—have decided that the United States remains in active hostilities, that decision deserves deference from the court. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 6:47 am
But in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
Texas courts refused, and the Supreme Court said the treaty was not directly binding on state courts unless Congress acted to implement it. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 1:17 pm
Last fall in Naji Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
In First Niagara Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:56 am
Much more later, but for now, the Court announced today that it will determine whether a 1993 congressional resolution requires Hawaii to reach a political settlement with native Hawaiians before transferring some 1.2 million acres of state land.Here's how the state's brief casts the issue: In the Joint Resolution to Acknowledge the 100th Anniversary of the January 17, 1893 Overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii, Congress acknowledged and apologized for the United… [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Only Congress has the power to spend money or impose conditions on federal grants to states. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
The Supreme Court deadlocked in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 8:55 am
Kavanaugh wrote that in the Supreme Court’s 1882 decision United States v. [read post]
