Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2861 - 2880 of 4,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2008, 5:12 pm
As far as I can tell, the rule in Arizona can be traced back to the 1954 Supreme Court of Arizona case State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm by Susan Brenner
Barr, __ S.E.2d __, 2012 WL 387867 (North Carolina Court of Appeals 2012). [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/64466-1.con.doc.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:13 pm
In a 3-2 decision, the three-justice majority of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, AFFIRMED the judgment appealed from, agreeing with the motion court that the exclusion's language was ambiguous: It is axiomatic that, "to negate coverage by virtue of an exclusion, an insurer must establish that the exclusion is stated in clear and unmistakable language, is subject to no other reasonable interpretation, and applies in the particular case'… [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 12:37 am by Peter Mahler
Court of Appeals in Friedman v Revenue Management, Inc. employed the Burford abstention doctrine to close the courthouse door to judicial dissolution proceedings even where diversity jurisdiction is present. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which is based in Cincinnati, in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gee, I wonder what implications that logic would have had for Keller v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by Jonathan Fitchen
Enka also however appealed the decision of Baker J to the Court of Appeal and duly received its requested declaratory relief plus an anti-suit injunction. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:11 am by Florian Mueller
I asked the appeals court earlier this week whether they had any news about Apple's motion to stay enforcement. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Joseph L. Hyde
The Court of Appeals’ hedging in McCormick finds some support in the literature. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:01 pm
The trial court dismissed the unjust enrichment claim, but on appeal to the Appellate Division, the State's intermediary appellate court, it was reinstated against CenterRock. [read post]