Search for: "State v. Long." Results 2861 - 2880 of 51,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2023, 8:04 am by HRWatchdog
Lawsuit Over Unlimited PTO The court case involving unlimited PTO is McPherson v. [read post]
  Foreign Official is broadly defined in the FCPA and includes officers or employees of: (i) any non-US government, whether national, state, provincial, or local; (ii) any department, instrumentality, or agency of a non-US government; (iii) any state-owned or controlled company; (iv) any non-US political party; and (v) any public international organisation (e.g., the World Bank), as well as any candidate for non-US political office. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 7:52 am by Dawn Mertineit
While the events forming the basis of the dispute in BioPoint, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
In New York, specific personal jurisdiction is obtained through New York’s long-arm statute (CPLR 302).CPLR 302 (a) (1) states:“a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over any non-domiciliary… who… (1) transacts any business within the state or contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
How does a subsequent legislative pronouncement change their liability for something that transpired long before the amendment? [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, petitioner's newly-asserted New York State unspecified constitutional religious freedom argument may not be considered for the first time on reargument, and, in any event, it is unavailing (see Kane v De Blasio, 623 F Supp 3d 339 [SD NY 2022] [City policy requiring workers in school settings to be vaccinated not unconstitutional]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
The closest Barrett came to taking a position on a controversial matter of public concern was a 2006 petition, which stated "It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]