Search for: "State v. Prime"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 3,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 11:07 am
The trial judge stated that in his “40 years prosecuting, defending and judging cases of every sort I thought I had seen it all – well I haven’t”. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:54 am
In Pineda v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:20 am
This call has apparently been rejected by the Deputy Prime Minister. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
(PlagiarismToday) Sweden Man fined for publishing links to legal sports broadcast (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom Prime Minister: UK needs US-style fair use to spur innovation (ArsTechnica) (Excess Copyright) Independent review of the IP system launched (IPKat) (Michael Geist) (Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) UK government says software patents should be easier to obtain (IAM) New UK government IP review must ask the right questions (IAM) Ministry of Sound gives up P2P claims… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
The patent relates to automatic, spring-loaded and pre-primed, injector devices. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/63016-4.pub.doc.pdf State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:34 am
United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:43 pm
It has also recently acquired stronger powers to punish disobedient states. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:48 am
This amount is in addition to a $1 million criminal forfeiture and five year probationary term ordered in connection with RMI’s June 22, 2010, plea of guilty to knowingly and willfully exporting defense articles without a license in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:02 pm
An Article V convention can’t ratify its own proposal. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Now that we have the reports from the third and final day of the meeting in Salt Lake City of ECUSA's Executive Council, we are finally able to fill in the picture of what is going on among the Church's elected and appointed officials. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:44 pm
., v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
Hirst v UK (No2) came along, and Tony Blair was asked at Prime Minister’s Questions for assurance that the likes of Ian Brady and Myra Hindley would not get the vote. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:43 am
Plumbers’ Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 10:50 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:37 am
” Brown v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:49 pm
” Halkin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
BFP v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:20 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
