Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 42,042
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am
The prevailing state of the law remains unsettled, with no explicit appeals court guidance to be found. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 7:55 am
In the case of Kudrocova v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:58 am
I.M. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:31 am
Decisions this Week European Court of Human RightsTimur Sharipov v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
Another week, another case of a prisoner who died because of incompetent medical care, this time out of Oklahoma. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 8:03 am
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Chrisman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 7:04 am
On December 16, 2022, the Second Circuit decided a case, Soule v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am
” Discussion Vice Chancellor’s opinion in the Fairhurst case will undoubtedly be the subject of extensive discussion and analysis in the weeks and months ahead. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:18 am
The email ... states in relevant part:Several weeks ago, Hamline administration was made aware of an incident that occurred in an online class. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:36 am
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am
“Affording plaintiff [Kirby] the benefit of every possible favorable inference, we find that she has sufficiently stated a claim for unpaid overtime under the Labor Law by alleging that she worked more than 40 hours per week and that defendants never paid her for the overtime,” wrote the justices. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:56 pm
But over time, they argued, the battlefield has changed and they believed the threat that President Vladimir V. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Brown v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:10 pm
THALER v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 12:53 pm
Cherrington v Erie Ins. [read post]
