Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 2861 - 2880 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
However, occasionally judges simply reject Section 230 because they don’t like it (this year’s crop include Jones v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
 . that  by reason of their sheer volume would add little to the effective protection of the public”); Cotton v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
Sticky Arbitration Clauses We present the results of the first empirical study of the extent to which businesses have switched to arbitration after AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
The case raises issues of such significance to copyright holders and online service providers that it may well end up as a landmark precedent of the U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:20 am by Venkat Balasubramani
For what it’s worth, on the question of whether Congress can enact statute that allow for recovery absent showing of actual harm I’m skeptical that courts will end up saying that this can’t be done. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
On its corporate website, Target tells consumers, “Even if you shopped at Target during this time frame, it doesn’t mean you are a victim of fraud. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:49 am by Eric Goldman
Presumably, this dried up traffic to ICF’s hosting customers, who I imagine weren’t thrilled. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:48 pm by Chuck Cosson
  In the run up to the rule’s effective date, consultancies developed plans and resources to implement the Directive’s requirements. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
UGC is an example of where notice and takedown wasn’t up to the magnitude of infringement in UGC (hunh? [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It deters them from making the most outrageous claims and allows people who are caught up in automated enforcement mechanisms to assert their rights. [read post]