Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 6,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am
On November 20, 2008, the day of the plaintiff’s hearing, the following comment was posted during working hours: “it’s always a mistake when people testify, because they get destroyed in cross examination”; d. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
Although beneficial to huge numbers of people, many vaccines also may seriously harm a very small number of people who react adversely to the product. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
” People v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:41 pm
Smith v Khan (2018) EWCA Civ 1137 Well! [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
There was no cross-appeal over the note. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 6:17 am
” People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am
People came from long distances to bathe in its waters. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
’ Yet, as the trial court found, ‘[o]n cross examination Dr. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
See Brooks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Bonner v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 4:07 am
Trial by jury is the essence of government reposed in the people. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in Aruna Shanbaug v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
See Van Orden v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:49 pm
Barr v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
., S.A. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
