Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 29,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
NLRB v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:21 am
City of New York, issued by Justice Ralph J. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:10 am
But one Justice on the court made clear that he was joining the majority only because he was bound to do so by the Supreme Court’s opinion in BP v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
The Court must now decide: Whether a state attorney general vested with the power to defend state law should be permitted to intervene after a federal court of appeals invalidates a state statute when no other state actor will defend the law.We will be closely following these cases, as well as the others on the Court’s docket. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 8:12 pm
On Friday morning, the Illinois Supreme Court answered "No," reversing the Appellate Court in Fennell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
On July 21, 2010 the Supreme Court of Wisconsin decided Sands v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
On September 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:25 am
And, more importantly, Chief Justice Roberts, as well as Justices Alito and Kavanaugh, ruled against state sovereign immunity. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:59 pm
Justice Jefferson wrote the majority opinion for the Court, joined by seven Justices. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 10:33 am
To preserve their authority, as well as the rule of law, the justices must reclaim what their predecessors in 1958 knew to be the only honorable and lawful course. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:01 pm
The King v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 4:15 pm
A few days ago, the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:06 pm
Even if the textual and historical arguments on both sides of the issue were evenly balanced, respect for the well-settled views of all of our predecessors on this Court, and for the rule of law itself, would prevent most jurists from endorsing such a dramatic upheaval in the law. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:21 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 10:21 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Gallardo v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:46 am
The first case the Justices will hear (Octane Fitness v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:35 am
In a speech last night, retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens made clear his displeasure with the Court's recent decision in Connick v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:10 pm
I agree with most of what Justice Kitching says here. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
For Mooppan and for Lori Windham, counsel for petitioners, as well as for some of the conservative justices, Loving v. [read post]
