Search for: "AT&T"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 881,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2017, 2:30 am
Using common general knowledge as a secondary document in the problem-solution approach usually requires a bit less argumentation compared to using a normal publication, e.g. it needs hardly to be argued why such content would be consulted. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:41 am
The determination of the prior use thus requires that the facts giving rise to the prior use must be established without gaps (see T 472/92, OJ 1998, 161, point 3.1 of the Reasons); however, this does not mean that the opponent has to provide each and every theoretically possible piece of evidence. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
Financial Advisor Steven T. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:08 am
The post The CRTC TalkTV Hearing: The Gap Between Can’t and Won’t appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
27 May 2012, 1:56 pm
In particular, the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:35 am
"Our vote to dismiss AT&T's application made clear that we will protect customer access to basic telephone service... [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 8:25 am
Trump, in case you haven't noticed, doesn't lose with grace. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
Most analysts think a merger of AT&T and DirecTV won’t matter much. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:57 am
The case of decision T 619/02 concerns a method of odour selection which involves a purely aesthetic choice deprived of technical character. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
T 1886/06 [1.4.2]). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:37 pm
T 1102/03 and T 1053/06), when deciding on a request for postponement of OPs, the discretion should be exercised considering the procedural economy, an optimised use of resources and capacities and the interest of the public. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 9:06 pm
In 2002 the Court of First Instance forcefully annulled the Commission's decision prohibiting a merger in Case T-342/99 Airtours v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:13 pm
As far as the determination of the disclosure content of a prior art document is concerned it has been held by the boards of appeal in several decisions that for the correction of an obvious error in such a document the skilled person may resort to readily accessible relevant external documents, for example to a corresponding US patent application in the case of an obvious error in a British patent application (T 412/91 [3.5]) or to the original document in the case of an obvious error in… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Win a T-Shirt! [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:55 am
The opinion that the criteria set up by the EBA in the cited decisions are valid only in the context of the use of a known compound for a hitherto unknown purpose and cannot be extended to process claims is also found in decisions T 682/04 [5.3.4-5], T 910/98 [2.2.2], and T 1049/99 [8.4.4-8.5]. [2.1.3]To read the whole decision (in German), click here. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:47 pm
Government $31.5 Million for Allegedly Violating Controlled Substance Ac t and False Claims Act appeared first on TZ Legal - Fraud Fighters. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:15 pm
Don’t mess with this guy, he will bring you down, bring you down to Chinatown. [read post]
19 May 2007, 5:12 am
US District Court Judge Marvin Shoob ruled that AT&T may change the logo from Cingular to AT&T by reason of the "grandfather" clause in it contract with NASCAR, as I had previously discussed. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
This article advocates that President Obama should act unilaterally to change how the Department of Defense (DoD) implements Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:41 am
If Tech Ain’t Happy, Ain’t Nobody Happy By Vivian Manning | May.29.12 | Daily Dispatch, Productivity, Technology You know your tech support folks love you. [read post]
