Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 3,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
On Tuesday, Akin Gump filed this merits brief on behalf of petitioner Carlos Jimenez in Jimenez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 1:07 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
(Disclosure: Akin Gump is co-counsel for the City.) [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:38 am
Kansas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:33 pm
The case, Montgomery v. eTreppid Technologies, LLC, 2008 WL 1826818 (D. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Writing for the Court, Justice Thomas explained that the holding of United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
The Sentencing Guidelines’ decision, United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
Karl Llewellyn haunted the Supreme Court this term, when Ali v Federal Bureau of Prisons was handed down on January 22nd. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 5:32 am
See Kaiser Aetna v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, the Court will weigh a petition from the state of South Carolina — Stewart v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:12 pm
Compare this case with United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
We have already seen this phenomenon at work in other states with marriage amendments, where courts are trying to figure out whether the amendment precludes public employers from providing domestic partnership benefits because that would be akin to recognizing a status "similar to marriage" for unmarried couples. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 1:43 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:13 am
State v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
(Disclosure: Akin Gump represents the petitioner.) [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:05 pm
Here is the abstract:The Federal Circuit's decision in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 8:50 am
"Yesterday, Akin Gump and the Stanford Clinic filed this reply brief in the case of Cone v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 7:25 am
Yesterday, Akin Gump and the Stanford Clinic filed this reply brief in the case of Cone v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:45 am
(Disclosure: Akin Gump represents the petitioner) Opinion below (3rd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 07-1019 Case name: Gorman, Jr., et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 8:45 am
On Friday the Solicitor General’s office filed this invitation brief in No. 07-539, Progress Energy v. [read post]
