Search for: "BAKER V. STATE"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 3,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
In Fiore v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
State of Indiana, a 7-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-respondent... [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
Sullivan, in which the Supreme Court upheld funding and facilities restrictions on women's access to abortion and abortion counseling.The brief also vehemently insists that the federal district court is bound by the "precedent" of Baker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
Sullivan, in which the Supreme Court upheld funding and facilities restrictions on women's access to abortion and abortion counseling.The brief also vehemently insists that the federal district court is bound by the "precedent" of Baker v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 1:00 pm
Stanford), had earlier filed their own intervenor motion and supporting paper, in S.E.C. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 6:30 am
The caption may read A.I.G. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:48 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:54 pm
Remember that CAAF decided that very issue last term in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
Supreme Court dismissed the earliest federal challenge to a statutory restriction in Baker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
After stating the amounts or percentages allowable on sums distributed by the trustee that are less than one million dollars, §326 says that the court can award the trustee “reasonable compensation not to exceed 3 percent of such moneys in excess of $1,000,000, upon all monies disbursed or turned over in the case to parties in interest, excluding the debtor [i.e., excluding Madoff]. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
See Baker v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:01 am
Louis Cardinals - United States - Law - California [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:03 am
Summary of Decision issued May 28, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Lucky Gate Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
Baker's partner, Dr. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
The Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:06 am
[www.nylj.com]
Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted:
United States, appellee v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:12 pm
A Texan by birth/stays a Texan/anywhere on earth. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ California Court of Appeal Holds that Home State "Permission To Sue" Procedures Are Substantive Rules After All In a case of first impression, the California Court of Appeal in Vaughn v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:43 am
Perhaps the most significant criminal case in our collection was United States v. [read post]
