Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 2881 - 2900 of 15,424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2021, 6:37 am by Chukwuma Okoli
He did not regard their relationship as contractual but one that appears to be “the agreement resulted from a casual conversation between social acquaintances in the context of mutual favours having been done in the past. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Unwired Planet v Huawei, Conversant v Huawei & ZTE: UK Supreme Court confirms Global FRAND licensing Sophie Lawrance, Francion Brooks, James Batsford Journal of European Competition Law & Practice On 26 August 2020, the UK Supreme Court (the ‘Supreme Court’)... [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 10:27 am by Eugene Volokh
I very much enjoyed this hour-long conversation, organized by the Pacific Legal Foundation, and I hope you do, too. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:32 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author David Leonard In a precurser of disputes sure to come, in Lyle v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Barzun, University of Virginia School of Law, has posted Quentin Skinner v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:39 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
“Most of the interview was talking about the impact of this Supreme Court decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:36 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In the Direct Claims Appeal, LMEG Wireless, LLC v Farro, ___ AD3d ___, 2021 NY Slip Op 00164 [2d Dept Jan 13., 2021], the Court ruled: LMEG, Wilhelm, and Schochet’s claims for breach of oral agreements to sell LMEG to third-party private equity firms were not unenforceable under the so-called “doctrine of definiteness. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:25 am by Hannah McAslan (UK) and Patty Tan
Conversely, UK payment institutions, electronic money institutions operating under the freedom of services regime and asset management companies are excluded from the temporary transitional measures and thus will not be able to continue operating in Italy. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
The case of Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers has sparked a conversation in the UK in recent months about whether coverage of Meghan Markle was racist. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]