Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 2881 - 2900 of 12,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 12:35 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Although federal contractors and subcontractors will be required to comply with Subparts A, B, D, and E of both new rules by March 24, 2014, the obligations in Subpart C of the new rules will be phased in. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:24 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, Sec. 1658(b)(1) did not apply and her claim was not barred by the “catch-all” four-year period. [read post]
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:18 am by Jesse Fishman
Section 145 –Definition of Company “Officer” Amended Section 145(c) redefines who is deemed an “officer” regarding any act or omission occurring after December 31, 2020. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 pm
Hence, in absence of transfer of risk, being an essential ingredient of sale, the transaction cannot be a sale. 1.4  In the transaction: (a) In a termination event, the Bank could require the Company to purchase all the outstanding debts and sum of the funds in use; (b) The Bank had to account to the Company who could recover full value of its book debts, i.e., if the payment by the Company’s customers to the Bank exceeds the sums debited in… [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
The plaintiff brought a class action, challenging the caller ID practices employed by the defendant, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T California (“AT&T”). [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
If you are advising a company on employee relations issues and the company is working with foreign companies, William Herbert's article Workplace Electronic Privacy Protections Abroad:   The Whole Wide World is Watching, 19 U. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Instructions are low-hanging fruit b/c they’re so bad right now. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:35 pm by Jake Siegel
If all of the investors are accredited, then there is no difference between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c). [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:50 am by Dan Cooper and Luca Tosoni
Furthermore, the DPC took the view that in emergency situations, where no other legal basis can be identified, companies may be in a position to rely on Article 9(2)(c) GDPR to process personal data to protect the vital interests of an individual data subject or other persons. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by News Desk
Serious violations: Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls (Subpart C) The firm did not implement their procedures for environmental monitoring. [read post]
1 May 2015, 1:30 pm
KG applied for invalidity of the BE HAPPY CTMs on the grounds that they lacked distinctive character and were descriptive of the characteristics of the goods they covered, according to Articles 7.1.b) and 7.1.c) of Regulation 207/2009 respectively .The Cancellation Division upheld the requests for invalidity, and the Board of Appeal confirmed the decision that the registrations were null and void because the marks were not distinctive. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 pm by Machael Heise
Without the backlog, the goal to have the first set of reviewer comments out to the company 4 months after submission. [read post]