Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 2881 - 2900 of 48,948
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 9:00 am by Picl Guest Blogger
High-risk zones start with the letters A or V, while low-to-moderate risk zones include zones B, C, and X. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am by Florian Mueller
As for the value of "the patent's inclusion in the standard," it's worth nothing that even Justice Mellor's InterDigital v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 2:45 am by Emma Kent
The current cost of living crisis is making it harder and harder for people to save deposits to get onto the property ladder. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:09 pm by José Guillermo
            En tal virtud, no se configura ninguna causal que vulnere el debido proceso, por el contrario resulta evidente entonces que el pedido de nulidad comporta una maniobra para dilatar el trámite de este proceso, como se precisó y no se puede permitir el abuso de derecho a que hace uso el demandado pretendiendo se declare la nulidad de actos válidamente notificados, por lo que también en este extremo… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Vitulli “breached a duty owed to the shareholder independent of any duty owing to the corporation wronged” (Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951, 953; see Kramer v Meridian Capital Group, LLC, 201 AD3d 909, 911; Jacobs v Cartalemi, 156 AD3d 605, 608; Patterson v Calogero, 150 AD3d 1131, 1133). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 2:24 am by Emma Kent
Since the case of Radmacher v Granatino in 2010, pre-nuptial agreements are viewed with the presumption that the parties entered into it wishing to be bound by it. [read post]
The ASBCA initially found Triple Canopy’s claims were barred by the Contract Dispute Act’s six-year statute of limitations and denied the appeals, which the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded in Triple Canopy, Inc. v. [read post]