Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 3,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
The allegedly false/misleading claims (1) suggested that NGP does not work only for Democrats and their allies, (2) indicated that multiple users were switching from NGP to Aristotle, and (3) compared Aristotle’s and NGP’s products and services. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:14 pm
"Now, I've not read a full report of this case but the result, although perverse, does seem correct as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:00 am
State, [87 S.W. 653, 653-54 (Tenn. 1905)]. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:12 pm
., 54 F.3d 1570, 1575 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
Secretary of HUD, 54 F.3d 1560, 1567-68 (10th Cir. 1995). [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
” Randy’s is located less than 1/4 of a mile from Andy’s and was recently ranked #1 for the best place to grab a frozen treat (Andy’s was ranked #2). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
§1325(b)(1); see also §1325(b)(1) (2000 ed.). [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:01 pm
(1:51:25 PM) Manning: i’d have to ask assange (1:51:53 PM) Manning: i zerofilled the original (1:51:54 PM) Lamo: why do you answer to him? [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:19 am
An Example 1. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
§ 3624(b)(1), a federal inmate is entitled to a credit of up to fifty-four days for every year of her “term of imprisonment” if she exhibits exemplary behavior during that year. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Officer Fenton transported Manriquez to the San Diego County jail where Manriquez took a breath test that showed blood-alcohol level results of 0.11 at both 12:54 a.m. and 12:59 a.m. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:06 am
The new Article 54(5) (equivalent to Section 4A(4)) fills this loophole by explicitly allowing claims to the further specific use of a known drug, and so the reason for this special, "judge-made" law no longer exists. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 10:41 am
§ 54-3-1.1). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:22 pm
” See footnote 54. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:27 am
In Colorado, C.R.C.P. 54(d) states that “costs shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing party. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:02 pm
Lawrence, 1 S.W. 204, 205-06 (Tenn. 1886)). [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm
It considered in particular the following list of issues for the application of Utah’s punitive damage awards: 1) The relative wealth of State Farm; 2) The nature of State Farm’s misconduct; 3) Facts and circumstances surrounding State Farm’s misconduct; 4) The effect of State Farm’s misconduct on the Campbells and others; 5) The probability of future recurrences; 6) The relationship of the parties; 7) The ratio of punitive to compensatory damages; Of… [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:17 am
Women interviewed: 3, 1 artist (her music was not played); total time on screen maybe 1 minute of 54 (plus extra interview footage of 3 guys). 2. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:30 am
The main legal provisions at issue are: -- GATT Article V:1, V:2, V:3, V:4; V:5, V:7; -- GATT Article X:3; -- TRIPS Agreement Articles 1.1, 2, 28, 31, 41.1, 41.2, 42, 49, 50.3, 50.7, 50.8, 51, 52, 53.1, 53.2, 54, 55,58(b), and 59, and Article 4bis of the Paris Convention of 1967. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:56 am
However, the three NAFTA parties as19 well as Tribunal's interpreting Article 1102 of15:00:54 20 NAFTA have come to the same conclusion. [read post]
