Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2012, 9:02 am
In the case of Hunter v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
— United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 2:44 am
In this regard, the UK Supreme Court’s recent landmark decisions in Vedanta v Lungowe and Okpabi v Shell have granted jurisdiction and allowed such claims to proceed on the merits in the English courts. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Herrera then spoke with defendant, who spoke English. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
Armed Attack and Request for Assistance As a starting point, Japan has repeatedly supported the International Court of Justice’s decision in Nicaragua v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 6:16 pm
Owen v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm
Learn more about the case:https://www.aclu.org/cases/bert-v-oconnor Stay informed about our workSign up [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 10:26 am
However, it also emphasised that, even though the legalisation of cannabis for therapeutic and recreational purposes is under discussion across the EU, the consumption and use of cannabis containing THC above a stated threshold remains illegal in most EU Member States. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 12:15 pm
Facts: This case (Osman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
Source: Apple Inc. v Registrar of Trade Marks [2014] FCA 1304 [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:08 pm
In Ariosa v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 7:22 am
Hulley Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:02 am
One noteable feature of last week's oral argument in Snyder v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:17 pm
If so, what are the effects of any such downshift on the relation between the state and the political constitutions of China. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
In Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers yesterday’s order inviting the United States to weigh in on Ridley School District v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 1:12 pm
The court distinguished United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
Lord Eassie went on to state at para. 48 of the Court’s judgment: “. . . we for our part do not see any reason why in ordinary, contemporary English usage ‘leave’ in this context should not simply connote a period in which the employee is free from work commitment. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:41 am
What that change will be wasn’t clear after the Justices heard arguments in the case of Christie v. [read post]
