Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
By Eric Goldman Novins v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:21 pm
While I dearly wish that "Monkey v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
She then decided to bring a claim for financial relief under English law on the basis that she had purchased a property in England in 2014 and, since 2017, had been living in England permanently. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 5:01 am
Sullum notes the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:42 am
A recent decision, Villamil v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:41 am
Introduction Under English law, charterers’ obligation to pay hire as it falls due is absolute but the right to withdraw a vessel in case of default in charterers’ obligation to pay does not arise automatically. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:42 am
A recent decision, Villamil v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
See also, Julio César Betancourt, Damages for breach of an international arbitration agreement under English arbitration law, Arbitration International, Volume 34, Issue 4, December 2018, Pages 511–532, https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiy030. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 12:38 pm
Yes, I fully understand that I am terrible at spelling, and grammar, and pretty much everything else remotely associated with the English language. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:39 am
In Axa Corporate Solutions SA v National Westminster Bank Plc & Marsh Ltd [2010] EWHC 1915 (Comm) Axa sought a declaration by the Court that a terrorism exclusion clause had been incorporated into its renewal of a public and products liability (PPL) policy with RBS, of which NatWest is a group company. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:25 am
In Vibe Media Group LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsuibishi UFJ Ltd v Sanko Mineral (The MV Sanko Mineral) [2014]EWHC 3927 (Admlty) Cargo Interests began proceedings in the U.S. against the Defendant former owner of the M/V SANKO MINERAL for breach of a contract of carriage. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsuibishi UFJ Ltd v Sanko Mineral (The MV Sanko Mineral) [2014]EWHC 3927 (Admlty) Cargo Interests began proceedings in the U.S. against the Defendant former owner of the M/V SANKO MINERAL for breach of a contract of carriage. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 2:54 pm
Footnote: See Pabon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am
There has been some discussion regarding the merits of the decision of the English Court of Appeal in the case of Richardson v Pitt-Stanley [1995] QB 123 over the last 20 years (see, for example, paragraphs 5.15 & 13.12 of Munkman on Employer’s Liability, 16th Edition). [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
The same could have been said of recent decisions at first instance on the corporate veil (particularly Ben Hashem v Shayif), until two magisterial judgments of the Court of Appeal this year: VTB Capital v Nutritek and, last week, Petrodel v Michael Prest. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 10:01 am
The children speak English, but not Hebrew. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:56 am
Two Norwegian municipalities had entered into swap contracts with Depfa which were subject to English law and the jurisdiction of the English courts. [read post]
