Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 2881 - 2900 of 76,287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2023, 9:52 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
Thereafter, IOSCO will consider the feedback with the aim to finalise the good practices by Q1 2024. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
China calls on the international community to act on true multilateralism, uphold the international system with the United Nations at its core, support the U.N. in playing a central role in international affairs, further develop and improve the global governance system, and jointly build a community with a shared future for mankind.I.Enhancing global security governance and safeguarding world peace and stabilitySecurity is humanity’s most basic need and the most important global public … [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
Our column anticipated that hypocritical lawyers working for Trump would say that the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional, despite the Supreme Court's reliance on it in Bush v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Van Ravenstein v Ponder 2023 NY Slip Op 33072(U) September 6, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 161420/2019 is an interesting opinion from Judge Shlomo S. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by David Bernstein
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm by Josh Blackman
In particular, here is the summary of Part V, which focuses on the office issue: Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm by Joanna Powis and Jonathan Lord
The ET provided valuable guidance for employers as to the steps that ought to be taken to have good prospects of being able to make use of the defence. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 8:48 am by Marcel Pemsel
The judges referred to the CJEU decision in Parfums Christian Dior v Evora (C-337/95), which found that damage to the reputation of a trade mark can be a legitimate reason within the meaning of the provision. [read post]