Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 44,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:01 pm
Stone v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:39 am
In UTSWMC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 pm
On 7 July 2010, the Supreme Court of Namibia gave judgment in the important defamation case of Trustco International v Shikongo (Case SA 8/2009). [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:46 pm
General Cable Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
Good question. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:33 am
One jurisdiction has proactively implemented some of the good thinking out there on smart grid privacy. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:43 am
That’s not to say jawboning is good governance. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:30 am
Like in NAM v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:55 am
Kesterson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In its 6-3 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:51 am
The Court in MacDonald v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
We believe that the legal doctrine erasing the barriers between church and state, and encouraging collusion between politicians and religions against the public good, has reached a tipping point that must be reversed now to avoid long term suffering and instability.The following examples illustrate a few ways in which religions are undermining the public good as they demand a right to sidestep the law. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 79 Fed. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
Regarding mutuality, the Order states: “In light of [AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston Culinary Group,… [read post]
