Search for: "Havens v. State"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 3,919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
The defendant in Cordova v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
Sound recordings weren’t brought under the protection of federal copyright law until 1972 so are protected by state laws and some services, notably SiriusXM, haven’t been paying performance royalties to artists to play these older works prompting claims from both artists (with Flo & Eddie from the Turtles leading the charge), record labels and collection society SoundExchange. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:30 pm
byJill Paperno, author ofRepresenting the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseIn People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:39 pm
Undoubtedly many others also exist, and haven’t come forward about their injuries. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm
The issue in Kansas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:16 am
Earlier: Potential Lawsuit / Bar Exam Review Question of the Day: Laurence Tribe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:03 pm
The pending Dukes v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Stocks v. bonds. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
" In Foley v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
In a class that is coming up soon, we will be discussing the U.S. transfer pricing rules.From a purely pedagogical perspective, when I read the recent case of Altera Corp. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm
Conte v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 3:10 pm
This is a state legislature purporting to ban something allegedly being done by the federal government in the air over the state, and presumably not just this state, but the others touched by the same air. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:22 am
In Gray v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Supreme Court* Federal Appellate Court Decisions* State Roundup* Topical* Articles/Reports/Books* Foreign SpotlightTo begin, scan the link descriptions below and click.U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:23 am
I haven’t watched live TV, except for sporting events, in years. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:58 am
But there’s an elephant in the room: Whitehall Township v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
Meese v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
The “twist,” although possibly a safe haven for Michigan borrowers, may not protect borrowers in other states, which is why this case has potential national impact. [read post]
