Search for: "House v. House" Results 2881 - 2900 of 41,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 8:54 am by Robert J. Terry
” The answer, Hackett added, is that “in-house counsel are not retreating, but instead continuing the march to drive costs and value away from measuring the value of hours alone. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am by Dave
 It is based on a wrong reading of the Supreme Court judgment in Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-Operative Ltd [2011] UKSC 52 (our note here). [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 3:00 pm
In reasons for judgment released on June 23, 2013, the Court of Appeal dismissed Ruth Scholz's appeal in Scholz v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 1:24 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Nicklin held at a hearing in London on Thursday last week that the article meant that Mr Morgan had, first, been able to take advantage of the opportunity to purchase six houses which had been intended to be sold as affordable housing but had not sold and a local authority changed its planning rules; second, bought the houses at a discount for personal gain; and third, taken advantage of his position, was greedy and unethical and had… [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by James Hamilton
Title V of the Act is the Swap Data Repository and ClearinghouseIndemnification Correction Act. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:01 pm
But instead of coming inside the house, he walked over to his car, which was also parked on the street in front of the house, and got into the driver’s seat.As Lopez was changing cars, a group of Sureños was driving through the neighborhood. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 3:15 pm
I was scanning the Court of Appeal judgments, waiting for White v Knowsley, when this came up: London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Ansell [2007] EWCA Civ 326 Now that is interesting. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 5:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Brief of the United States Amicus Briefs Supporting Petitioners: Amicus Brief of Alaska Congressional Delegation Amicus Brief of Assn of Alaska Housing Authorities Amicus Brief of Cook Inlet Region Inc. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:12 am by sally
El Goure v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 670; [2012] WLR (D) 155 “Although the legislation did not lay down the criteria of special circumstances in relation to priority need for housing homeless persons, a separated parent’s reasonable expectation that his children, who were living with their other parent, would move to live with him did not impose an obligation on the local housing authority to consider the parent’s… [read post]