Search for: "In Re: CONTEMPT"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 3,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2008, 8:04 pm
Respondent's improper use of subpoenas tended to give the third party (who apparently was unrepresented) the false impres- sion that he could be held in contempt of court if he failed to appear and produce the documents requested. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO releases ‘FY2008 Performance and Accountability Report’; claims success despite backlog (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Prospector) USPTO transition team appointed (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property… [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:42 pm
In 62 days, a new President will take over, having pledged to shut down Guantanamo altogether and to re-think the government’s entire policy of military detention and war crimes prosecution. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 5:36 pm
They're a symptom. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago… [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
Question Time for Iain Dale? [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:35 am
As for whether it's defamation to say someone believes in Jesus, it depends which side of the line you're on and what you believe about crossing it. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 3:59 pm
While Bernini expressed concern why CMI was not cooperating, ‘from an ethical standpoint, we’re not concerned,’ Berkman said. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 10:50 am
The contempt motion was, therefore, denied, but the infringement case continued. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:55 pm
I think they’re wrong. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:33 am
" that discussess the law on having an attorney appointed for contempt cases:"Further, caselaw requires appointment of counsel in contempt situations even if the contempt proceeding is brought by a private person rather than by the state: 'we hold that where the possibility exists that an indigent defendant may be incarcerated for contempt for failure to pay child support he or she has a right to appointed counsel and to be informed of that right… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 6:29 am
It would also bar financing for a "first offender" program for prostitutes and their clients or for mandatory "re-education programs. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:33 pm
For that reason, it's best to make sure you fully understand what you're getting into before you buy and know a little about the association's history for granting any exceptions. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 4:02 pm
In Re: Grand Jury (Islamic Investment Company of the Gulf (Bahamas) Limited), No. 07-2353 (10/10/08 -- reissued for obvious reasons). [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:04 pm
Then the only remedy is a contempt of court proceeding, which is time consuming (up to a year) and costly. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, October 14, 2008 In re Vincent Basciano, No. 082157 Writ of mandamus seeking judge's recusal based on government-furnished evidence suggesting that petitioner had plotted to have judge murdered, is denied where petitioner did not "clearly and indisputably" demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion. . [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 1:25 pm
Can an act of domestic violence by one parent against the other constitute sufficient “changed circumstance” to warrant a Court’s re-examination of an existing custodial arrangement? [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:15 pm
I have to admit, though, it's probably easier than thinking about what you're writing. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 4:09 am
In Re: Ruth Pollack, ___F.Supp. 2d___(E.D.N.Y. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:05 pm
This is, in effect, a request that the Bankruptcy Judge hold the violator in contempt for thumbing his nose at the federal discharge order. [read post]
