Search for: "In re Doe" Results 2881 - 2900 of 107,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
”If you're going to ticket for the porn chalking, you have to ticket for kid's scribbles. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:57 am by Quinta Jurecic
Does this willingness to compromise and do violence, and yet always feel the pain of compromise and violence, really make for a better leader? [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
The Fourth Circuit today, in the case of In re Bees, reversed the trial court's imposition of sanctions based on an attorney's oral statements during a motion hearing. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:03 am by Melissa Blazejak, Editor
Tolan explained how Spark Hire still does happy hours and picnics and also does a movie night, which he said is a huge hit. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:48 am by David M. Ward
Even if you’re a partner or you have staff that does most of the work, you still have to show up, make decisions, and supervise. [read post]
So if you're allowing social media to interrupt other important things you should be doing during the day (such as by allowing notifications or other alerts to distract you when you're working on a substantive project), it might be time to re-think how you use social media. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:24 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
They’re consequently left in a bind: there’s not great evidence about the safety and efficacy of products they can take to be safe from COVID-19. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 5:21 am by Jon Hyman
As I’ve said before, religious proselytization does not belong in the workplace. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The board does not see why the [opponent] should react to experimental evidence which is not “in” the proceedings (even if it could be expected that it would be re-filed in appeal proceedings). [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 12:26 pm
However, as discussed below, this very substantiated finding of detriment was unnecessary given that the law does not change, once guardianship is selected as a child’s permanent plan, to suddenly give a mere alleged father a new presumptive right to visitation. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:06 am
 He's fully on board Justice Kennard's opinion, but writes separately to discuss at length a different statutory provision that has confused various appellate courts in dissolution case, and does a great job of providing guidance. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:14 am
The Department of Transportation’s Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulation – 49 CFR Part 40 – does not authorize the use of Schedule I drugs, including marijuana, for any reason.Therefore, Medical Review Officers (MROs) will not verify a drug test as negative based upon learning that the employee used “recreational marijuana” when states have passed “recreational marijuana” initiatives.We also firmly reiterate that an MRO will not verify a drug test… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
First, does the situation involving the DC hotel and Utah National Guard soldiers involve a Third Amendment question? [read post]