Search for: "In v. United States" Results 2881 - 2900 of 102,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2017, 1:00 pm by EEM
Labels as Evidence of a 'Particular Social Group'," Arizona Law Review, vol. 59, no. 1 (2017) [full-text] Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (26 May 2017)Tagged Publications. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 1:00 pm by FM Librarian
” Here’s What That Means for Immigrants (Vox, updated 5 March 2018) [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (16 Feb. 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by EEM
What We Know and What It Means," Journal on Migration and Human Security, vol. 5, no. 2 (2017) [open access]Polling Shows Australians Don’t Trust Trump on Refugee Swap (The Australia Institute, May 2017) [text]"Refugees and Asylees in the United States," Migration Information Source, 7 June 2017 [text]Statement on Secretary Tillerson’s Defense of Massive Cuts in Humanitarian Aid (Refugees International, June 2017) [text]- See also related Politico comment… [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
In this term, the justices will hear two cases involving the privilege: United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:15 pm by Walter Olson
United States, which began as a ‘lover’s triangle’ dispute from Pennsylvania but has mushroomed into a major test of the power of Congress to implement international treaties in ways that may interfere with the prerogatives of the 50 states. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:08 pm
Among those improvements are renovations to facilities within each apartment unit and improved physical security for the project itself. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:26 pm by Mark Engstrom
Suunto Oy, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1930, 20 July 2016 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:23 pm by ilpc
On June 15th, The United States Supreme Court has issued an opinion in the highly anticipated Haaland v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
Regardless of whether you are happy with the outcome of the Affordable Care Act or not, you can celebrate one thing: United States Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts, a George W. [read post]