Search for: "JONES v. U.S." Results 2881 - 2900 of 3,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2020, 9:52 am by Bill Marler
Speakers Include:  Bill Marler, attorney and food safety advocate, MarlerClark Frank Yiannas, Deputy Commissioner, Food Policy and Response – U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 9:29 pm
In a U.S. 9th Circuit precedent, the court regarded both read and unread e-mail, or received and unreceived e-mail, as being in "electronic storage" under the SCA (See Theofel v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:59 am by Matt Murphy
Justice Sotomayor stated it eloquently in the recent Supreme Court case US v Jones: GPS monitoring generates a precise, comprehensive record of a person’s public movements that reflects a wealth of detail about her familial, political, professional, religious, and sexual associations. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This significant case requires the Justices to apply the Fourth Amendment -- adopted in the 18th Century -- to the modern age.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm by Stewart Baker
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm by Michael Gordon
  On May 9, 2022, a Fifth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Community Financial Services Association v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:35 am
Unable to land his plane on the rocky tundra to investigate, Baker alerted the U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Heather M. Milligan
My favorite is how in some big firms, partners of equal experience charge different rates, and associates are paid differently, based on their location (New York v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Here’s an excerpt: The Second Circuit ruled on August 24 in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm by Dan Gauss
Jones that GPS device tracking triggers Fourth Amendment protections. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:50 am by David Urban
  (The Supreme Court in fact rejected a rule of personal liability for retaliation in Jones v. [read post]