Search for: "John Robert"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 20,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2021, 12:30 pm
“The Revenge of John Roberts: And what it will take to rescue democracy from a Supreme Court and a GOP hell-bent on dismantling it. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:35 am
(Nina Totenberg & Eric Singerman, NPR) The Supreme Court’s Latest Voting Rights Opinion Is Even Worse Than It Seems (Richard Hasen, Slate) The Revenge of John Roberts (Andy Kroll, Rolling Stone) The Surprising Future of Free Exercise of Religion at the Supreme Court (Lael Weinberger, Newsweek) SCOTUS Revisits Gun Control (Damon Root, Reason) The post The morning read for Friday, July 9 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:07 am
Justice Barrett delivered the opinion, in which Justices Roberts, Breyer, Kagan and Kavanaugh joined in full. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Stephen Skowronek, John A. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
But in the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that disclosure laws must be “narrowly tailored” to important government interests. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, addressed a fleeing suspect. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article for Yale Environment 360, John Paul MacDuffie and Sarah E. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:31 am
LoPinto, and Robert R. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 8:10 am
The Roberts court continues to issue rulings that harm our democracy. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am
“The refusal of Philadelphia to contract with CSS for the provision of foster care services unless CSS agrees to certify same-sex couples as foster parents violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in majority opinion joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 6:12 am
Flood has prepared the motion for Judge Robert Pitman of the Texas Western District. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 2:39 pm
. __ (2021, S.Ct. docket 19-251), Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the 6-3 majority, struck down a California law requiring charities to disclose their major donors, or be barred from activities within the Golden State. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 7:34 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: A Supreme Court Term Marked by a Conservative Majority in Flux (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Justice Barrett Showed Her Conservative Stripes but Defied Expectations (Jess Bravin & Brent Kendall, The Wall Street Journal) Barrett moves Supreme Court to the right, but cautiously (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Here Are 5 Takeaways From The Supreme Court Term (Nina Totenberg, NPR) Steady term of the Supreme Court ends with politically fraught… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 6:15 am
Only time will tell whether Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett will sidle up to Chief Justice John Roberts' P.R. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 10:29 am
" by John D. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
It is also notable that Chief Justice John Roberts has taken a strong pro-property rights position in almost every Takings Clause case that has come before him since he joined the Supreme Court, most recently in the important Cedar Point case. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 6:44 pm
“John Roberts takes aim at the Voting Rights Act and political money disclosures, again”: Joan Biskupic of CNN has this report. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:45 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts: Samuel Adkission Christina Gay Maxwell Gottschall Dennis Howe Justice Clarence Thomas: Christopher Goodnow Steven Lindsay Michael Proctor Jose Valle Justice Stephen Breyer: Elizabeth Deutsch Erika Hoglund Diana Kim Joel Wacks Justice Samuel Alito: Shelby Baird Thomas Gaiser Eric Palmer Edward West Jr. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:37 pm
In contrast, only 12% of cases (8 total) were decided 5-4, a sharp drop-off from the 20% average since John Roberts became chief justice in 2005. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:28 am
The driving forces are doctrinal differences among the court’s six conservatives, Chief Justice John Roberts’s preference for incremental rather than sweeping change, and the embrace across ideological lines of the principle that judges should follow the language of the law. [read post]
