Search for: "LOPEZ"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 5,191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
We think this further limiting principle is unnecessary because it's implicit in what the Court has already said in Lopez and Morrison, but we have no objection to its adoption. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:30 pm
Today's issue of TL Answers contains these articles: Anthony Campbell, Review of GroupWise Migrator Plus Tips on Moving to Exchange Alexander Lopez, Three Options for Ensuring a Permanent Fax Number Brooks Duncan, Review: FileCenter Willis Blacknall, Review: UltraMon Don't miss this issue — or any future issues. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm
But that insurance piece is, as the Court (Scalia included) put it in Lopez and Raich, when they were explaining that various kinds of even non-economic activity (i.e. activity where no one is buying or selling anything) could still be regulated under the Commerce Clause, “an essential part of a larger regulation of economic activity. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
Fillburn), or weed (Raich), or carrying guns near schools (Lopez), or committing violence against women (Morrison)? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:11 am
" The Court further found (as to the second Lopez prong) that "it cannot be said that SORNA’s focus on Coleman’s failure to register as a sex offender so decouples the regulated conduct from the instrumentalities of interstate commerce that it becomes unconstitutional. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:47 am
” This is true, and is, as Siegel points out, a distinction from Lopez (carrying guns) and Morrison (gender-related violence). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
Lopez.) [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:44 pm
In other words, Lopez and Morrison remain secure if the Court upholds the provision.3. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:33 pm
Lopez, 514 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm
Lopez. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:26 am
But a hopeful example, believe it or not, is that of entertainers Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony who have managed to maintain their public images throughout their divorce, and are even continuing to leverage their joint brand and the goodwill of their fans - as individuals and as a couple. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:36 am
From left, Kathleen Kirby, Michael Satin, Superior Court Judge Jose Lopez, U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
--developed after Lopez and Morrison, and it has been taught and applied on exams for the last half-generation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
You know, this is beginning to remind me of the Lopez argument. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:38 pm
Moreover, reliance on Lopez is a bit rich coming from Breyer, who dissented in Lopez and would undoubtedly vote to overturn it tomorrow if he could; and (3) this is not a limit, it’s judicial abdication, though it’s what Breyer really believes. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm
(It’s not a Drew-Days situation where Days couldn’t offer, in Lopez, any limiting principle; here there’s one on offer, so the question is whether the only demand in the case is for a limiting principle, or rather is for a “good” or “strong” or something like that limiting principle.)Maybe these points will come out more clearly in tomorrow's severability argument, where the connection between the insurance provisions and the mandate is the… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:12 pm
Lopez, Laramie Municipal Judge, should be publicly censured for the conduct described in the “Commission’s Findings and Recommendation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
The chickens came home to roost somewhat in Raich, as Justices Scalia and Kennedy peeled off of the Lopez/Morrison majority to make a 6-3 majority in favor of applying the CSA to medical marijuana. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
If they are like the vast majority of their fellow constitutional law professors, the answers are (a) I didn’t take the Lopez case seriously enough to even spend time thinking about it (Lopez got five votes); and (b) either one or zero (Raich got three votes). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Lopez (2005): This decision was the first in 60 years to limit Congress' commerce clause power. [read post]
