Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 6,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
” (Quoting County of Inyo v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:50 am
Indigenous health policy in the United States and Latin America: The Marshall trilogy and the international human rights approach. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:44 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 1:57 pm
State of Washington (Treaty Right to Take Shellfish) California Valley Miwok Tribe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
Superior Court; Nichols v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:23 am
Superior Court; Nichols v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am
Citing the two step ripeness test, established by the United States Supreme Court in County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:47 pm
Khan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:14 am
The City of Fargo appealed under the equal protection clauses of the North Dakota and United States Constitutions. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:18 am
With the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:32 am
” The Court held “that the Secretary of State does not have the power under the Crown’s prerogative to give notice pursuant to Article 50 of the TEU for the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:42 pm
, v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 2:13 pm
United States, 336 U.S. 511, 522-23, 69 S. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:30 am
China’s rapid land reclamation and construction in the Spratlys and the July award issued by the UNCLOS tribunal in the Philippines v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
“Therefore, this court and the United States Supreme Court agree that statutes of repose are to be read as enacted and not with an intent to circumvent legislatively imposed time limits. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:18 am
For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/eff-petition-graham-v-us For more on these cases:https://www.eff.org/cases/united-states-v-graham Contact: JenniferLynchSenior Staff Attorneyjlynch@eff.org AndrewCrockerStaff Attorneyandrew@eff.org Share this: Join EFF [read post]
