Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 2881 - 2900 of 45,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 10:05 am by Lawrence Solum
The bottom line in the Health Care Cases (National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 12:42 pm by Giles Peaker
Samawi v Haringey LBC, Claim no: A01EC488, 3 July 2015 Central London County Court Thanks to an Arden Chambers eflash comes news of a County Court case with interesting potential repercussions, albeit probably some way down the line. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
Instead she crossed the center line, and into the path of the pickup truck driver, Mr. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 2:18 am by Nick Austin and Mike Adamson
The question of whether demurrage liquidates all or just some of the damages arising from a charterer’s breach in failing to complete cargo operations within the laytime has divided practitioners and academics for decades and, more recently, the English Court in K Line Pte Ltd  v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:16 pm
Employee’s performing job related “outside work” ruled a conflict of interestReichel v Water Auth., App. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 2:43 am by Anthony McCain
Eddie Obissi and Michael Borella: McRo v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 1:43 pm
Not a line you commonly see in a court opinion, and yet there it is, in today’s Jehovah v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:15 pm
  We guessed that the Court may use the case to open up a new line of battle in the war against punitive damages. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:54 pm by ALeonard
  This is not the end of the line for same-sex marriage in New Jersey, however, as Lambda Legal promptly announced that it would go back to the state courts to ask that the constitutional quality promised by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Lewis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm by David
David Cassuto From the email: The DePaul Center for Animal Law cordially invites you and your colleagues to join us for this year’s symposium, “Revisiting the Line between Free Speech and Obscenity: U.S. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:12 am
The Court of Appeal has ruled that it can be within a court's discretion to reduce a successful defendant's costs award by two thirds because of lies told during the trial.In Sulaman v AXA Insurance and Direct Line Insurance [2009] EWCA Civ 1331, the appellant was appealing against the first instance decision that her costs be reduced by two thirds because she had lied to the court in two respects while giving evidence.Sulaman was suspected of being part of a group which… [read post]