Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 13,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
Lumley v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 8:59 am
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
In a particularly egregious case, the administration rearranged the line of succession in the U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am
This is a bastardized version of the initial interest confusion doctrine, along the lines of the now-fully-discredited 1999 Ninth Circuit Brookfield decision. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
In a perfect world, people would be able to represent themselves and make their own choices in the legal system. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:51 am
irketi v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
The first is Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd: a company dedicated to support of the rights of the Palestinian people and opposing racism. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm
" This view of the framers became the bulwark of American jurisprudence in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
Members of PH groups impersonate children in order to expose people who they consider to be sexual predators, often streaming their in-person encounters online and later reporting their findings to the police. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
Since the start of the Covid-19 crisis, several luxury brands have launched their own lines of face coverings. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm
And if you look at that, you’ll see that it has a line that says…”You are being considered for transfer for the following reasons,” colon, and there’s a blank to be filled in. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:47 am
The 12th case in the collection, Xiang Jiahong v Dreamer Film Ltd. et al., was selected specifically to show the boundary of fair use regarding calligraphy works.The plaintiff, Xiang Jiahong (Mr Xiang), is a well-known calligrapher. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm
Leaving aside the rather predictable (given the team's public dilation on the issue of a potential name change) instance of trade mark squatting, most of the IP interest came from proceedings in the TTAB and the District Court of Virginia, and the subsequent ruling of the Supreme Court in Matal v Tam. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:04 pm
The DSM-V criteria for PTSD includes witnessing trauma, direct exposure to trauma, or indirect exposure to trauma while in the line of duty. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
Vergara v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
See, e.g., Scott v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 1981 upheld male-only registration in Rostker v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:49 am
In People First of Alabama v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:41 am
I would think a mask requirement would be constitutional under Crawford v. [read post]
