Search for: "London v. State" Results 2881 - 2900 of 4,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2011, 9:50 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
” The other approach, consistent with the Introductory Note to the IBA Rules of Ethics for International Arbitrators (1987), the London Court of International Arbitration Rules and the American Arbitration Association Rules was to grant a similar immunity but to exclude intentional wrongdoing. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
 So when the judge says The question is not whether facilities are better in London than in the Western Cape. - he is making a point about the proper considerations to be taken in to account in whether a court should or should not allow a country to export a citizen for trial by a foreign state. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am by Tobias Thienel
 On the basis of this European Arrest Warrant, Mr Khurts Bat was arrested in London, and his extradition to Germany was approved at first instance by a Magistrates' Court. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Anthony’s College, Oxford University  Revolution Triumphant: Political Discourse and the London Shrieval Election of 1682, J. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
” (See MedImmune v Genentech, 549 U.S. 118, at 127 (Sup Ct, 2007)), the Court moved to consider the main issue at play in the case: patentable subject-matter. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Richard Mumford
Dr Mattu declined to sign an action plan drafted by the Trust providing for a year long programme of clinical training in London. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:38 am by tracey
Cout of Appeal (Civil Division) Meares v Medway Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 897 (28 July 2011) Greyfort Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 908 (28 July 2011) Lait v Evening Standard Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 859 (28 July 2011) O, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [2011] EWCA Civ 925 (28 July 2011) St Helens & Knowsley Hospitals NHS Trust v Brownbill &… [read post]
The current law is now stated in the Equality Act 2010 but the issues in this appeal remain pertinent and are not affected by the revocation of the Regulations. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
It is, therefore, relevant to note that so much was the value attached to the precedent of the highest court that in The London Street Tramways Co. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:50 am by Adam Wagner
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play Does “bringing rights home” mean bringing problems home too? [read post]