Search for: "Mark Case" Results 2881 - 2900 of 70,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 3:37 am by Eric S. Solotoff
In cases where there could be ties to other countries, some discussion should be had to determine whether safeguards need to be put into place. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:23 am
Tina Worsley, Executrix of the Estate of Mark Worsley had her case against AETNA Life Insurance Company and Duke Energy Long-Term Disability Insurance Plan decided by the United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division on January 25, 2011. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:18 am
John Welch blogs about a precedental TTAB case holding that Section 44 of the Lanham Act doesn't create a 'famous marks' cause of action here. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Masaki Mikami
The Appeal Board of Japan Patent Office (JPO) has reversed an initial decision by JPO examiner to refuse the mark “GOTHAM CITY” with a logo, and ordered to grant protection for the mark by decision of March 14, 2017 [Appeal case no. 2016-9140]. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:04 am by Ron Coleman
From Dennis Crouch: Carl Oppedahl lost his case to register the mark “patents.com. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:39 am
L'Oréal SA and others v Bellure NV and others (Case C-487/07); [2009] WLR (D) 203 “The claimants, producers and marketers of luxury perfumes, were the proprietors in the United Kingdom of well-known trade marks, some in the form of word marks alone, and others being word and figurative marks including a representation of the bottle or [...] [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:23 am
Tina Worsley, Executrix of the Estate of Mark Worsley had her case against AETNA Life Insurance Company and Duke Energy Long-Term Disability Insurance Plan decided by the United States District Court, Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division on January 25, 2011. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:00 am by Legal Talk Network
Mark explains how complaints move from the Attorney Grievance Commission to the ADB, outlines the types of cases that often require disciplinary action, and clears up common misconceptions about the relationship between the ADB and the State Bar of Michigan. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:20 am
Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli-Strickmode GmbH (Case C-495/07); WLR(D) 6 “Where the proprietor of a trade mark affixed the mark to items that it gave free of charge to purchasers of its goods, it did not make genuine use of the mark so far as those items were concerned, for the purpose of, inter alia, art [...] [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:00 am
"   The article quotes Mark Robinson (who argued on behalf of the plaintiffs in Tobacco) and Will Stern (who authored Prop. 64). [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 8:15 am by Eileen McDermott
In its February decision, the CAFC held that “applying section 2(c) to bar registration of [Steve] Elster’s mark unconstitutionally restricts free speech in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 8:15 am by Eileen McDermott
In its February decision, the CAFC held that “applying section 2(c) to bar registration of [Steve] Elster’s mark unconstitutionally restricts free speech in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 6:25 am by GGCRBHS&M
Come to listen to our partner Ben Rubinowitz and other trial legends including Mark Mandell, Judy Livingston, Paul Luvera and Danielle Mason as they discuss the Case Framing theory and give you guidance on identifying issues that jurors “just can’t get over,” proving good issues, and overcoming bad issues. [read post]
The post India Supreme Court grants bail to opposition leader in money laundering case appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 3:03 am by Eleonora Rosati
It was also noted that Icelandic companies would have the right to use their country name in any case, as Uzbek legislation prohibits registering geographical names as trade marks.Considering all these factors, the Board decided to dismiss the claim and uphold the validity of the trademark.EUIPO Grand Board decision in the 'ICELAND' caseIn contrast to the above-discussed case, the EUIPO decided to invalidate the ‘ICELAND’ trade mark held by Iceland… [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 3:38 am
In any case, the Board "must apply the law to the facts in every case before us, irrespective of what happened to other marks which, due to their being registered, we do not have the opportunity to review. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm by Mike Danko
The FAA does not endorse painting over the old marking because this practice merely preserves the old marking, which is some cases have misled pilots . . . [read post]