Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 7,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
It would work the same in reverse.More substantively, Congress can also change the laws that govern what executive bureaucrats do. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:00 pm
I Sec. 7)? [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:28 am
Mark R. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:32 pm
In the wake of the era of corporate scandals, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
They could have said Congress meant to change it, but they didn’t it.In re Zahn, 1980, drill shank case. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 11:23 am
As he puts it, “If Congress had wanted to instruct courts not to impose statutory damages in a punitive way, I suspect it would have said so directly. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
That limits the potential for this defense a lot—would not have helped ZOMBIE CINDERELLA, but why not recognize the functional portions of each mark? [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 2:16 pm
Kaplinsky and Mark J. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
From my title, you may think I am referring to the battle over the REDSKINS trademark. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:36 am
I. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:29 am
But Maybe Congress Will Act Faster… Mark Borges notes that this Bloomberg/BNA article reports that a new version of the “Financial Choice Act” will be introduced in Congress later this month. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:34 am
” [16-341-texas-et-al] Without the Government Brief, Mark Lemley’s brief (on behalf of 61 professors) may be seen as the most influential. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
To preclude review, especially of underlying issues, Congress must speak expressly. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 9:58 am
From left, presidential candidate Donald Trump greets Chancellor Mark S. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
I should probably explain a couple things. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
I, Sec. 8, cl. 8) from the moment he put his hand to the Bible on January 20. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:25 am
By Mark S. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:24 pm
But as it turned out, this marked only the opening lines in what proved to be a long dialogue between Congress and the Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:21 am
To address this, the Courts and Congress have historically given the President broad leeway to obtain foreign intelligence. [read post]
